Archive for June 2009

Rigid Ideology Is Oppressive

In Iran we are witnessing the latest conflict between two constantly battling world views: the idea is that there is one correct set of beliefs and behaviors that human beings should follow and the idea that humans should be at least somewhat free to believe and behave as they desire. It’s a battle between the open and closed minded—the very religious vs. the less dogmatic.

It shows once again that religion is often a surrogate for earthly wealth and power—in this case a particularly virulent form of power.

In this country it’s the Republicans that I identify with the type of closed minded power that seeks to tell everybody else how to live. The fact that they want to loudly declare the righteousness of the protester’s cause in Iran is exactly the opposite of what they would do if we had mass demonstration in the streets against some future unpopular right wing war or a more disastrous economic collapse that represented “letting the market work.”

If you look at the battle in Iran as being between the proponents of change and the keepers of the faith, it’s the Republicans who are most similar to the hard-line Islamists.

Witnessing a Century of Change in Personal Communications

My mother, Adina Ferri, who passed away on May 28, 2009, was an exemplary person who lived her life demonstrating a high standard of personal values, traditions, and decency.

Her 80-year life journey began as a young girl in Canosa Sannita, a small town in Italy; matured as a teenager who spent 18 months in a concentration camp during World War II in Northern Italy; and culminated with her life as a proud, naturalized American citizen.

As a young girl, she and her family lived off the land in what we now consider a very organic, holistic, largely plant-based culture in harmony with nature.  They cultivated linen from seed, worked it into thread, and used it to embroider fabrics.  Their wheat crop was milled into flour for breads and pasta.  And their harvest of beans, grapes, olives, and fruits fed a large family and enabled them to buy salt, sugar, and other commodities they couldn’t grow.

In her small, Adriatic coastal town, my mother was part of a very strong community where neighbors went in and out of each other’s houses as if they were family.  They borrowed each other’s pots and pans, and shared charcoal, cooking oil, and baked goods.   Everyone looked out for everyone else, and unfortunately gossiped about everyone else—but the communication was all face-to-face and word-of-mouth.

When bombs were falling on their small town during World War II, they didn’t have the AP or CNN to tell her how the war was going.  They saw German soldiers running roughshod through their town, and later watched them run away in fear as American tanks bearing Red Cross banners rolled along, signaling the end of the War.

In her lifetime, my mother developed strong interpersonal skills in dealing with people, and upheld her generation’s affinity for visiting with relatives and friends.  If she didn’t hear from someone in awhile, she wouldn’t hesitate to pick up the phone and call them.  Because she valued people and personal relationships, she cautioned me not to carry grudges, judge people’s motives, or burn bridges.

In the years before she died, the world had changed dramatically.  She could watch RAI, Italian public TV, 24 hours a day on cable; and a world of news, communications, and services were also readily available on her daughter’s PC and BlackBerry.  She relished telling everyone she knew how she found great recipes or shopped with incredible convenience on “The Internet.”  She didn’t understand what the Internet was, but fell in love with what it could do.

In stark contrast to her background, her grandchildren’s interpersonal relationships were not fueled by Afternoon Coffees, but rather by texting, Tweeting, and “friending” people on Face Book.   In their online world, news is instantaneous, multifaceted, and emanates from different sources worldwide.

While their way of communicating isn’t face to face as it was in my mother’s day, they’re able to rapidly blast their thoughts to everyone and anyone in the world.  But in this electronic world, their generation is losing the interpersonal skills and energy exchange my mother’s generation derived from being part of a close-knit community.

Proposed Rules for Global Harmony

I just read an article in the May issue of Wired about the Georgia Guidestones, aka the American Stonehenge. The Guidestones are a huge granite monument built in 1980 by a mysterious man who called himself R. C. Christian. I was very intrigued. The main point of interest is that the message is pretty much in agreement with the philosophy of HumansTogether. The possible exceptions are the limit to the population and the bit about reproduction “fitness.” (Although one can imagine a value system that favored these limitations in order to produce a less competitive and more abundant, healthy species.)

The premise of the Guidestones seems to be that earth has had a global catastrophe and needs some guidelines in creating civilization 2.0. So the apocalyptic vision is something we want to avoid, but in general, the global approach is something that we can get behind. Here’s what is written on the slabs in 8 languages:

MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000
IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE

GUIDE REPRODUCTION WISELY —
IMPROVING FITNESS AND DIVERSITY

UNITE HUMANITY WITH A LIVING
NEW LANGUAGE

RULE PASSION — FAITH — TRADITION
AND ALL THINGS
WITH TEMPERED REASON

PROTECT PEOPLE AND NATIONS
WITH FAIR LAWS AND JUST COURTS

LET ALL NATIONS RULE INTERNALLY
RESOLVING EXTERNAL DISPUTES
IN A WORLD COURT

AVOID PETTY LAWS AND USELESS
OFFICIALS

BALANCE PERSONAL RIGHTS WITH
SOCIAL DUTIES.

PRIZE TRUTH — BEAUTY — LOVE —
SEEKING HARMONY WITH THE
INFINITE

BE NOT A CANCER ON THE EARTH —
LEAVE ROOM FOR NATURE —
LEAVE ROOM FOR NATURE

Why HumansTogether?

The planet is under stress. Soon there will be too many humans and not enough clean water or food. Our global economic system is breaking down.

Already millions live in misery. Hate and war are common. We are at a point where we must work together globally or face even greater hardships. If we don’t cooperate to create a fair distribution of resources and sustainable abundance, rather than compete over the earth’s bounty, life will be miserable for all—even those who win the competition.

HumansTogether is based on the idea that we humans should focus more on what we have in common than what separates us.

Our common humanity should bind us together in community and compassion on this miracle of a planet. Religious, national, racial, cultural and political beliefs that pit humans against each other should recede and the sense of our common humanity should grow in our consciousness. This is the only way to overcome the many planetary crises we face.

To help humans make this shift in focus from us and them to us, HumansTogether will promote a new understanding that our species is the crowning cosmic creation of billions of years of evolution. The matter that humans are made of was literally created in stars. We must see ourselves as citizens of the Cosmos—perhaps the only example of self-awareness in the universe.

We must learn that our differences are not as great as our common humanity—at an evolutionary level we are all the same.

HumansTogether is an ongoing exercise in articulating new shared positive beliefs and values based on what the latest scientific discoveries and advanced thinking has to say about the fundamental questions and truths pondered by our species.

Our explicit focus will be on the quintessential eternal issue: What beliefs and values should human beings hold in order to produce the most positive results for the most people?

Beginning as a blog, our goal is to become a content producer of diverse media that focus on cultivating common beliefs and values that have occupied our collective consciousness for a long time. We’ll take a fresh look with an eye toward finding as much objectivity and agreement as possible.