Tag Archive for Politics

The 2014 Midterm Elections

November 10, 2014 Congress, Economics, Politics, Republicans, Values, Wealth No comments

The thing I hear most in relationship to this recent election is that voters “want something to get done.” The main issue seems to be entrenched dysfunction and non-cooperation between the parties. And certainly, it would be nice if both parties worked together to solve problems for the vast majority of the population.

But talking about the ability to “get things done” is ridiculous when not connected to what it is that should get done. The Republicans have obstructed pretty much everything Obama and the Dems put forward, including a lot of appointments, whether they have policy objections or not. The point, as McConnell articulated early on, was to oppose Obama at every turn. The good of the majority of Americans was beside the point. So I guess it’s natural that they ran on an “Obama bad; Washington is broken; we’ll get things done” platform. But what they really want to do—block the minimum wage, cut government benefits except to the wealthy, and return control of healthcare to insurance companies—is very unpopular and unhelpful to most and will continue to widen the dangerous disparity of wealth.

Here is my point: it’s not simply about “getting things done.” It’s about getting the right things done. That being the case, I have become a fan of gridlock, because the Republican-controlled House and Senate are unlikely to “do” anything beneficial.

The Government is Not a Business

June 27, 2011 Economics, Media, Politics, Republicans, Values, Wealth No comments

Have we forgotten whose policies caused the plunge?

In the graphic above, lifted from ABC’s “This Week” with Christiane Amanpour, the yellow line shows how much deeper the current recession is than all previous recessions, at least since 1980. So because the economy is not healing fast enough, we should turn its management back to the people whose policies caused the crash in the first place? Look doctor, my loved one isn’t getting better as fast as I would like. So I think I’m going to go back to the doctor who administered the poison. You know, because whatever you’re trying to do isn’t working. Maybe that other doctor will be good this time.

This reasoning seems to be treated as perfectly logical in the lame stream media. That’s right, I’m using Sarah Palin’s phrase, but for the complete opposite reason. The lame stream media seems to accept the Republican spin that reducing the deficit is the most important step we can take to create jobs. Why? It’s clearly bullshit. Yes we need to cut the deficit, but to even pretend that this will somehow revive the economy is ludicrous. Cutting is cutting. You can’t cut programs without cutting jobs.

What does a CEO do when he needs to get the company back on solid footing? He cuts jobs. He lays people off. He reduces spending to improve the bottom line and get profits back up. Fine. This restoration of the company’s fiscal health doesn’t create jobs, it costs jobs.

The policies the Republicans are trying to put through are not about jobs. They are about deficit reduction, which is essentially restoring the country to a fiscal balance. They seem to view government as a big corporation that is not in good fiscal health and themselves as CEOs who will cut spending and restore the company to the black. They clearly care more about fiscal responsibility, i.e. profits, than they do about the well-being people. This is about the ideology, or rather mythology, of personal freedom. When people are free from government regulations and programs that take money from the worthy workers and wealthy job-creators and give it to the undeserving lazy poor then everything will be in balance and a growing economy will be magically restored.

Not only is this ideology totally wrong, with no possible way of creating growth, it will exacerbate the destabilizing disparity of more money going to fewer and fewer super rich overlords. This is fascism and it’s where Republican policies have been and will continue taking us.

At this moment in time, as the Republicans petulantly refuse to consider any discussion of closing loopholes on their large corporate puppet masters, it seems as if many of these zealots truly believe in the righteousness of their cause and are willing to crash the global economy in the name of fiscal balance. This is shear madness. And yet the “free press” pretends that it’s a legitimate approach. How can one not be pessimistic when clear stupidity passes for a valid economic option and when people are so deluded and mislead that they will seriously consider returning the patient to the care of the poisoner?

The End Is Near

July 2, 2010 Economics, Energy, Evolution, Politics, Values No comments

If you’re awake and paying attention you may have noticed that things aren’t going so well right now. The oil spill in the gulf is a harbinger of more difficult challenges ahead as we have to go to greater depths, literally and figuratively, to find the oil that powers our world. That’s because the end of easy cheap oil is here. That’s bad news for the economic reality of the life we’ve become accustomed to. Because to work properly, the dynamics of our current economy depend on constant growth fueled by cheap oil. So the end of life as we know it is near. And the change that is bearing down on us is not pretty.

Of course it’s not like the economic system we have has been working all that well anyway. The middle class is going backward and the millennials are really going backward in terms of prosperity. The world economy had to stop growing sometime. Constant growth—in the stock market, in home prices, in ever more affordable energy—has never been possible. But it’s only now, when it’s ending that we realize we shouldn’t have expected an ever-rising arrow of economic well-being.

The idea that most of our kids will have a better life than we did has already ended. With cheap energy ending, global warming coming and a world economic system increasingly unable to sustain itself at the current level, life as we’ve come to know it is definitely ending.

The question is how bad will it be when it ends? You see, many great civilizations, such as Rome and the Egyptians, collapsed not because of conquerors, but primarily because they grew too large for the energy resources available. Their agricultural land went fallow and in the case of Rome at least, the dark ages ensued. (This is laid out in the great 2009 book The Empathetic Civilization by Jeremy Rifkin.) Right before the industrial revolution Europe was entering an energy crisis because the wood they used for virtually all housing and energy was almost gone. Fortunately rail and mining technology arrived just in time for a transition to coal without a real nasty economic collapse.

Will we be so fortunate? Or will we only transition to new forms of cleaner, sustainable energy after life as we know it ends? Right now the power lies in the hands of those who control the oil and the industries that rely on it. Unless we all rise up and recognize it’s already ending and work together to make a transition many of the humans on this planet are definitely going feel extreme stress. I don’t want civilization as I’ve known it to end. But unless we radically change course, the end truly is near. It’s too bad that many in power have let self-interest be a blanket they pull up over their heads to keep from having to acknowledge how near the end is.

Question Your Beliefs

April 14, 2010 Evolution, Politics, Values One comment

Where do your beliefs come from? Did you get your religion from your parents or did you reject your parents view completely? Did you make a decision to believe what you believe based on logic or did your values come by absorbing the views of your community or culture? Do more highly educated people have different beliefs than less highly educated people?

It’s hard to answer these questions, at least for someone who hasn’t read a lot of scholarly literature about the subject. The point is that beliefs come from a lot of places for a lot of reasons and most of them are not acquired based on a logical evaluation of all possible alternative beliefs.

Religion and culture are good examples. There are probably people who chose a religion after carefully evaluating and comparing all the tenants of the world’s spiritual practices. But more than likely the religion you have is the one your parents had, and you adopted it without really being aware that there were alternatives. And even without exploring the alternatives, there are many Christians who believe they have a handle on the ultimate governing principles of human reality. Those who were raised in other traditions believe just as fervently that they are the most righteous.

In this country, it kind of goes without saying that “America is the best country on earth.” Many, if not most of us, simply except this. We have an ingrained bias against anyone who is not American, even if we know intellectually that being born in any particular location doesn’t make a human being superior to another human being.

The fact is that beliefs drive behavior and if we are going to pull together as a species to solve the imminent planetary crises that we face, we have to take control of our beliefs. They can’t be random. We need to come together around a set of beliefs that recognizes that we are more alike at the core than we are different. Before we think of ourselves as Americans or any other nationality, we have to think “I am a human being on planet earth.”

This bigger picture vision locates us more appropriately for working together and appreciating our common humanity.

Lost in the Flood

March 28, 2010 Communication, Evolution, Politics, Values No comments

I wear my iPod when I go for a walk. Today, when I heard Springsteen’s “Lost in the Flood” off his first album from way back in the 70’s, a new meaning occurred to me: Lost in the flood of thoughts.

All of us, unless we take great pains to step outside them, are lost in a flood of conscious thoughts that prevent us from connecting with our true selves. We’re focused on the things that are right in front of us, right off the front bumper of our awareness, instead of looking down the road and getting a more comprehensive view of what’s actually affecting all of us.

We get absorbed with our own self identities instead of the fact that we are all human beings on planet earth. We are all the same.

All of the hate and separation we feel from others is based on a belief that we are all different and that those differences are dangerous. They are dangerous because the others may want to hurt us, or because the others have ideas that if correct, would make us wrong, or cause us to question what we believe. And no humans are really in love with being wrong or having to change.

And that’s the point, under the superficial differences of appearance, culture, religion, class, gender and politics; we are a single species that is way more the same than different. We are all here together on this planet, an infinitesimal oasis in a cold and empty universe (so far as we know). After billions of years, we are the highest example of life-based, matter-connected consciousness that exists (so far as we know). And we’re in danger of destroying ourselves because we see our own personal survival and that of our group as being in competition with other humans who are exactly the same as us.

I believe the highest calling we have as humans, is to recognize that all of us are responsible for getting our species through to the next stage of evolution. This can be a world in which we cooperate together by acting from a set of beliefs based on we are all the same, we are all valuable, and we are all deserving.

The alternative is a set of beliefs based on I’ve got mine, good luck to you. That belief is not going to move humans forward. That belief will keep us divided and invested in fighting with each other, because it is based on a fundamental untruth—that I, my family and my group are better and more deserving than all the others. It is based on denying the truth that we humans are all the same underneath.

Not Equivalent, but the Same Underneath

March 26, 2010 Evolution, Politics No comments

Sarah Palin is right. There is a major problem with the main stream media. The problem is that they assume an equivalence between the right and the left. I’ve heard people I respect say that the problem is polarization. That we have the rantings of Glen Beck on the right and Keith Olbermann on the left. That’s not the problem. The problem is that the insane, deranged, lunatic ramblings of Glen Beck are given equivalence to the insightful, beautifully written, calls to inspiring action of Keith Olbermann. One guy from the left and one guy from the right and their views are supposed to be equally valid. They’re not.

A friend of mine told me something he thought was particularly insightful. The Democrats are playing Jeopardy, trying to be smart about the facts. The Republicans, on the other hand, are playing Family Feud, trying to figure out what a random selection of not too well educated people might answer based on their gut instincts. These things are not equivalent. One is based on rationality and one is based on fear, superstition and the propaganda of Fox News.

But here’s the thing. Underneath, at the core, all human beings are the same. Emotionally we all want validation and respect. But what we don’t realize is that we don’t have beliefs, beliefs have us. Once we adopt a belief that government is bad, or that liberals are trying to take away our freedoms or that Southern fundamentalists are unsophisticated rubes, we are trapped in beliefs that make dealing with those with opposing views very difficult, if not impossible.

However, if we remember that all humans have the same need for love and validation, and we understand that the beliefs others are acting out of represent what they have become as a result of their circumstances in life, it is easier to be tolerant.

Republicans are currently lying about healthcare reform (government takeover) because they are angry that they are no longer in control. Their belief is also because of their parents, their church, and the superior attitude they picked up from those who could afford to go to an expensive college. Whatever.

The point is that they are feeling bad about themselves and acting out. Underneath they are humans that need love, just like all other humans.

It’s the same with Israelis and Palestinians. They are born as totally equivalent human beings and they become hateful toward each other as they absorb the beliefs of their culture.

This site is about understanding that we are all the same. We are unbelievable miracles of evolution—the highest level of consciousness that the universe has produced (so far as we know). So no matter how unequivalent various notions of reality may be, underneath, all humans are exactly as valuable as each other. Seeing that core truth is what will save us from destroying each other.

No Free Market

July 29, 2009 Politics One comment

I have a niece who is a junior at college. She’s very bright and articulate and politically engaged. However, she seems to be a libertarian. So I sent her The Shock Doctrine, by Naomi Klein to start a discussion with her. That was in April. Here’s the follow up email.

I have been delinquent in engaging in the discussion I intended to start with you about politics via The Shock Doctrine. I understand that you became disillusioned with it after a while and decided it wasn’t worth the time. No matter. The point is that the last time we spoke, you seemed to have some libertarian-like ideas that gave me the impression you believed in free market capitalism. I wanted to engage you on this point because there is no such thing as free market capitalism, unless you mean that those with the capital are free to call the shots and everyone else should believe in the myth that they too can become rich and keep their mouths shut.

The Shock Doctrine shows that many of the dictators in the recent past, such as Pinochet, who used torture and murder to maintain power, was secretly backed by the free-market capitalists of the University of Chicago and the IMF. This capitalism, in essence, delivered state assets and the country’s natural resources into private hands at the point of a gun. Free market capitalism equaled brutal dictatorship. The brutality—the shock—was a necessary accompaniment because without it, in a democratic system, the populace would never have allowed such pillaging of the common national resources.

The official story in the US media was that we were of course against this brutality, as most human beings are. However, when you dig down, as the author did, you find that all of the financial institutions of the capitalist world—IMF, banks, and others—were supporting the brutality for economic gain.

The point being that free market capitalism is not free, not virtuous, and not in the best interests of most humans in most countries. Capitalism that is properly managed by governments elected by the will of the people, as we have in this country, is superior to free market capitalism because it brings other important values into the equation.

When capitalism is not regulated aggressively enough, it runs amuck. That’s why we’re in the economic mess we’re in now. And yet, we remain committed to a system where less than a year after they were allowed to drive the economy of the world into the ground, the capitalist demigods of Wall Street are once again reaping bonuses that total more that what most people make in ten years.

I suggest that this money has nothing to do with the value these demigods delivered to society. Which is OK. Neither do the salaries paid to sports stars or entertainers. It is natural to want to be a demigod. But we should not be confused that the type of capitalism being practiced in this country, and indeed since kings and noble people controlled all wealth, is the best way to organize societies concerned with things like social justice and ending human suffering. There needs to be a careful nurturing of the instinct that allows people to transform themselves into demigods along with the authority to keep these demigods from controlling the system solely for their own benefit. For that is the natural course of free market capitalism.

Rigid Ideology Is Oppressive

June 22, 2009 Politics One comment

In Iran we are witnessing the latest conflict between two constantly battling world views: the idea is that there is one correct set of beliefs and behaviors that human beings should follow and the idea that humans should be at least somewhat free to believe and behave as they desire. It’s a battle between the open and closed minded—the very religious vs. the less dogmatic.

It shows once again that religion is often a surrogate for earthly wealth and power—in this case a particularly virulent form of power.

In this country it’s the Republicans that I identify with the type of closed minded power that seeks to tell everybody else how to live. The fact that they want to loudly declare the righteousness of the protester’s cause in Iran is exactly the opposite of what they would do if we had mass demonstration in the streets against some future unpopular right wing war or a more disastrous economic collapse that represented “letting the market work.”

If you look at the battle in Iran as being between the proponents of change and the keepers of the faith, it’s the Republicans who are most similar to the hard-line Islamists.